Movie Review: Avatar was a Bad Movie
I rarely do movie reviews, but when I stand in such strong opposition to the general analysis, I feel I must speak out.
Avatar was a very weak movie. The special effects and graphics were cool, but outside of the 3-D, I did not think it was anything spectacular visually. There have been hundreds of high budget sci-fi and fantasy movies in the last few years with incredible computer graphics; I did not think it really stood out above the rest of those.
The story was awful. I could have told you the entire rest of the story 5 minutes into the movie. So, the main character is going to be implanted as a spy into a world of indigenous people that respect their planet? Wow, I wonder if he won’t become entranched in their ways, fall in love with one of them, effectively become one of them, and take their side in the battles that were sure to come. So, it proceded to go on for 2 hours and 35 minutes more of exactly what was expected storyline-wise.
The rest of the story was weak as well. What started off as an interesting science experiment turned into a cheap video game shoot-em up plot. I was not emotionally moved the entire movie nor was I challenged mentally to handle any sneaky plot twists. And, man were those some unoriginal sci-fi names (“unobtainium”, “pandora”, and “avatar”?!). Looking at the four other billion dollar movies in history (Titanic, LOTR: Return of the King, Dark Knight, PotC) all of them (except maybe “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest”) had better story lines than this movie.
The acting was poor enough to make Sigourney Weaver’s performance seem quite good, which is sad. But we cannot fault the actors too much. With so many of the cheesy one-liners in that script there was not much room to escape.
Back to the 3-D. I think the concept is quite cool and it does add an interesting twist to action movies. I last saw a 3D movie back in the late 80′s. Unfortunately, I do not think the 3-D technology improvement in twenty years has been anything monumental. I was expecting more and while it was a fun visual experience, I do not think it was anything extraordinary.
All in all, I think the hype is a bit much and people are too easily swayed by the ability (with much expense) to put this action and graphics into 3-D. If we continue to see more and more 3-D movies, people will look back on this and laugh. How are we so easily swayed by a 25 year old technology trick into thinking a horrible script and acting is an amazing film?
Related posts:
- Bad Driver Online App Idea How often do you see a bad driver do something...
- Book Review: The Tipping Point Title: The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a...
- The Born Warning This one comes from Manoj…great find. The head of the...
I liked it
Saw it last night and thought it was brilliant.
I walked out of the movie and somebody asked me if I liked it and I told them I wasn’t sure. To be honest with you, I’m still not sure what I thought of the movie. I watched it in Real-3D.
Avatar is totally shit USA Hollywod American Dream wrapped in one,im vomiting right now,yuk.
I absolutely loved it so much I watched it twice so far and wouldn’t mind going a third time honestly. As far as the graphics and animation, it will lead the way for future movies for many years to come. They weren’t actors doing sound bites and animators going off for a couple years using computers to make the movie. It was all actually acted out. They really rode the dragons creatures with a manual device they had to learn to balance on with a computer suit on. I’m not sure how you can make animation look much more real than using actual human movements on as many points and objects as possible. He actually wrote the script 13 years ago and the technology to do what he wanted just want there so 5 years ago he got it out and started trying to make it work. It blows me away personally. I’ll give you the predictable story line somewhat but what else would you really want to see? Do you want to see a new weapon that makes their heads turn into big helium pumpkins and they float into outer space until their body implodes or what? What is so wrong with a good story – a little bit of love, a little bit of action, a little bit of motive change … and the wheel goes round and round.
I ask you to go to youtube and type in “The Making of Avatar by James Cameron” or just “avatar” and you will find tons of stuff about how they made it and what the story is all about and such.
later,
Jonathan
“I’m not sure how you can make animation look much more real than using actual human movements on as many points and objects as possible.”
Real dragons.
win!!!
Cameron didn’t invent motion capture technology. They’ve been using that technique (actors performing with a mo-cap suit) for about ten years now. Case in point, Lord of the Rings. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnOeixfWLcs
not to mention the near 100 year old technique of rotoscopeing. like the first lotr (ralph bashki version)
its like mo-cap but with hand drawing.
not to mention the story and acting was crap.
the visuals were the exact same as star wars 3…which was way better. cgi does not make movies, case and point:Dark Knight, great acting great story, great visuals and stunts, and almost no cgi. Chris Nolan i by far superior in that way.
I also thought that the movie did not live up to the hype. The message is commendable, however, the plot was painfully predictable. Special effects aside, I felt it was an average movie. As new age as the movie seems, we have seen this story before.
Funny that you say we’ve seen this story before. Have a look at this rewrite of Pocahontas:
http://failblog.org/2010/01/10/avatar-plot-fail/
Do you remember a certain children’s movie called Thumbalina it’s almost the exact movie. I honestly can’t see why a person with at least a little brains can’t see through this movie. The predictable script, acting, and the tentacle things in their tails makes this movie with me being generous a C-
i couldn’t agree with you more Conor.
you have put it into words so well the way i feel about this
typical shit film.
Agreed. The movie was predictable and uncreative; one big cinematic cliche. The animated parts looked just that: animated. There was too much of everything also. the dialogue dragged the movie out too much, and I caught myself looking at the time frequently. I had no issues with the politics, but I didn’t have any interest in it either. The movie was all hype, and I didn’t buy any of it. Frankly, the hype is the only reason people are liking it. Of course, that’s my opinion. And i’m sticking to it.
The 3D was good, but 3D does not automatically make a movie awesome. Titanic and Return of the King were lightyears ahead of this movie. Bad story line, bad acting…tsk tsk. Doesn’t work. I think the only reason it grossed so high was because people EXPECTED it to be mind-blowing so they went and bought the tickets…and 3D is relatively more expensive than normal 2D.
“How are we so easily swayed by a 25 year old technology trick into thinking a horrible script and acting is an amazing film?”
Because the average movie-goer sees amazing ENTERTAINMENT as a whole, not an amazing FILM based on the “rules” you critics think up.
Typical fan boys going against the grain… Using Apple MACs are we?
No Macs, just iPhones.
Maybe that’s because your brains don’t have a high enough IQ to critisize anything. And I’m not a freaking boy. I suppose then that no book, peice of art, or meal should ever be judged? Am I expected to eat crap because I should be grateful that I am eating? Of course I’m grateful, but that does not mean I can’t want better.
Simple as that.
“Because the average movie-goer sees amazing ENTERTAINMENT as a whole, not an amazing FILM based on the “rules” you critics think up.”
Please note a fine line between seeing something as ‘entertaining as a whole’ and completely ignoring a film’s flaws because there where other elements you liked-specifically, denying any issue with acting or writing because the Avatar entertained you with its visuals.
Good visuals do not make Avatar “entertaining as a whole”. Especially for those who need a little more good stimulus -mental or otherwise- than that to be entertained -and there is nothing wrong with that.
It’s like saying thinking is bad.
I guess you critics also hated Titanic? Funny how the public get it so wrong so often isn’t it.
Personally I loved Avatar and was able to ignore the ‘cliches’.
I go to the movies to lose myself and imagine. You guys should try it sometime, you just might enjoy it.
Yup, I hated Titanic. Really, it ought to have been called “Generic Sinking Boat: Leonardo DiCaprio Gets the Girl, and Dies Heroic Death.”
I would love to know how you managed to ignore the cliches, and still have any film left to see? Personally, I go to the movies to enjoy a thought-provoking story, and immerse myself in a complex plot. Avatar failed in both respects. It was pathetic.
Yeah, because you can’t think and imagine at the same time, can you? Did it ever strike any of you ~imaginative~ people that there is nothing wrong with having enough brain cells to need something more than a movie telling you to be amazed, saddened to thrilled in order to feel that way? Because that’s the thing….you don’t imagine with Avatar. Or most movies, actually. You imagine with a book, because your interpret the words and create your own mental imagery…Avatar gives you the imagery, it tells you who to root for and what is right and what is wrong. The most you do as far as imagining goes is some sort of mental copy-pasting of yourself into the character’s shoes. You do none of the creative processing yourself.
Which is why some like this movie. No mental stressors whatsoever. Not so bad in an of itself, but it doesn’t make it a good movie objectively, only subjectively. Hence why critics take issue with Avatar being considered an objectively good film (winning best picture) and not as much with its popularity -though if all fans are as closed minded as you, and its appearing to be more and more the case, then I can see why said popularity would be disheartening for the future of film and art.
Lots of critics have movies that they love that they good and well know are complete crap….and guess what, they’ll admit it!
What was so imaginative about “Avatar”. Besides Cameron’s Self-Serving “I’m right everybody else is wrong political attitude.” I could not get lost in the storyline. And What I would have liked to have seen was this; If those head been the real military those hostile slimey green ugly gross aliens had been going up against; they would have been splatted like “Green Splooge” outside of the first half-hour and the “Jake” character would have been figuring out to smuggle that unimginative “Unobtanium” Back to earth so he could make a couple of billion dollars underneath his bosses back. He probably would have stuffed in the body of one of those dead NAVI’ as the they were shipped back to earth as Museum pieces. Then how story would have involved him dealing with Smugglers and otheer elements of the Cloak and dagger.
I know what I wrote is sick. But I Can’t believe all the greed Cameron has and delibrately and uneffectively tries to hide it from the world. And I can’t believe I spent $15 to see that shit! The SouthPark Version a Thousand times better.
Great special effects.
Weak story, offensive to aboriginal people.
Obama would love it.
CGI was good, nothing mind-blowing. The storyline was just stock standard, straight out of the factory…lame
Because of all of the interest, I created a poll on the GreenTaxi Facebook page… What was your favorite holiday movie?
http://www.facebook.com/pages/GreenTaxicom/46294121380?v=app_138079047824
It was Dances With Seven Foot Smurfs.
I would have left 1/2 way but I was fumigating the house and had nowhere else to go. it was bad
No one has mentioned ‘Battle for Tera’ which came out a year or so before Avatar. Same movie exactly. 3D space adventure. Marine falls in love with alien and then fights back against his own kind to protect the aliens. I thought ‘oh, cool, for once humans are the invading aliens…’ and that was about it. Bottom line – That movie sucked too but at least was only 1.5 hours long. Animation was great in Avatar, so what. I hate you all.
Look its not a bad movie… its enjoyable at times (the first half hours is very interesting)… and can be boring and typical at other times! Put it this way I enjoyed parts of it and completely hated LOR (Lord of the Rings)
But the fact that it is typical computer technology (star wars prequels and many other movies from the past decade) all out clash of the worlds final battle movie and the movie solely focuses on the plastic character like syndrome and animals (I did like the blue people but eventually got bored of them) is pretty lame but the worst part is it is just a typical story done a thousand times over with the same visual effects and technology. The movie now is the biggest money making move off all time ahead of Titanic!
Did anyone notice typical James Cameron style?? I.e. the radar/sonar used in “Aliens” an “The Abyss” & “Total Recall” type theme! And what’s with the machine guns, shouldn’t there be lazar like weapons this far into the future!
I mean did the movie world just come out of a coma – is this all new too cinema goers (patrons)
I like JC as a director he is great at what he does but avatar was just a poor excuse of an idea he had 15 years ago and finally decided to make it now. If it wasn’t for the Blue People (the Avatar) the movie would be a flop! But wow avatar is the highest grossing movie, what the? Must be a Gen Y thing! That’s what I hate about Avatar it was marketed and promoted well with an interesting trailor plus it has been a while since JC made a movie but no one noticed the big let down and where just sucked in by the Big Blue Characters! (there cute but half hour is all I need)
I should post this blog on some “I think avatar is over rated movie site” !!!
Avatar still is better than LOR!!!! Hahaha
“If it wasn’t for the Blue People (the Avatar) the movie would have been a flop!”
So you are saying if it wasn’t for the main part of the movie than it would have flopped? OF COURSE IT WOULD HAVE. Thats like saying if the boat wasn’t in Titanic the movie would have sucked. Or if the Republic wasn’t in Star Wars it would have been a failure. Common logic has been lost on many people I believe.
“Thats like saying if the boat wasn’t in Titanic the movie would have sucked. Or if the Republic wasn’t in Star Wars it would have been a failure.”
First and foremost the latest installments of Star Wars where the Prequels, a story has already been established with the original Star Wars therefore this laid a benchmark to allow Star Wars Fans and non Fans the opportunity to see the foundation of the Story – How it all Began!
Avatar is different! It initially was promoted as a bold new concept in movie making and story telling but failed to live up to that expectation, even though the movie was a massive hit! The movie started off extremely well but failed to overall deliver the goods. The final fight was very typical! Yes there where parts in between where the native people could connect with the dragon type creature was great and to see the humans enter Pandora and leave their world behind was fascinating but this has been done before with countless of other movies.
You in adversely agreed with my quote “if it wasnt for the Blue people the movie would have been a flop” Exactly! I have become anti this movie because of the success it has had at the box office! You cannot compare this movie to Titanic, period! Titanic was bold and fresh even though it was based on a Ship in the early 1900s in which we have heard about time and time again, the fact that Titanic had a strong script between Leonardo and Kate and the story and lives of others surrounding these two characters combined with the amazing construction of the ship and the visual computer imagery and effects (this style of computer effects where at their humble beginnings in the mid 90s)contributed significantly to Titanic’s success – Your quote “if the boat wasn’t in Titanic the movie would have sucked” – Really? Are you Sure?? Or is it that there wasnt enough computer made up characters in the movie of which we have been constantly bombarded with over the last decade that has allowed you to fail to see the beauty of the movie!
You where sucked in by the Avatar and failed to see the deep underlining issues. I on the other hand liked the Avatar Character for the first half hour but noticed the typical syndrome with the movie – and was not sucked in by the colors, playdoh plastic like creatures for the full 2 hours. However I did enjoy the anti Bush administration political jargon quotes.
If it wasnt for having common Logic, as you state that people have lost, that I wouldn’t be asking the question “why is this movie the highest grossing film of all time”? It is because I can see that this is what people want – more computer animated movies. Its just a shame that the highest grossing movies are seen to be as “great flicks” hahaahah. Some are and some aren’t – Avatar surely isnt a great flick regardless of the “Blue People”. Its purely just a fad!
so…… you’re admitting that the focal point of this movie was tall blue people? I don’t even have anything to say to that.
You are a one sentance MORAN. Did your baby rattle fall out of your mouthy when you where watchy Avatarie…!
If your game read this article… my views exactly!!!!!
http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/2009/12/21/why-did-i-hate-avatar/
This review hits the nail on the head 100%! To have this movie nominated for best picture just reaffirms that Hollywood knows as much about great movies as they do about politics.
Ha, classic analogy!
HAHAHHAHAA The acting was poor enough to make Sigourney Weaver’s performance seem quite good, which is sad.
HHAHAHAH I GOOGLED WHO YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT AND LOL!!!!!LMAO!!! HAHAHAHA im dying in laughters LoLLL!!!! = P
A bad movie. Horrible writing from the individual lines to the whole story. I think they got in every single cliche possible. I didn’t walk out only because I never walk out of movies since my father dragged us out of Rumble Fish when I was a kid. The worst part of the movie is that while it seems to be promoting environmental awareness, the hyper sensory stimulation and overload makes the real world, and real nature, seem boring. In that case it probably does more harm to environmental awareness than good. And then what can you say about all the money, electricity, and resources wasted on making it that could have gone to actually doing some good.
This predictable plot line you so readily assault is called an archetype. The movie was great: Fantastically entertaining and visually stunning. An absolute RIDE.
You’re just being cantankerous.
I bet you watched this in 3D.
Please note that it is highly likely that half of the ticket sales where related to 3D sales. And highly likely that half of the people who watched Avatar where only curious, intrigued and entertained by the 3D aspect. And probably why the movie was also released in 3D!
But when you watch the movie in a normal cinema it is quite plainly animated and very plastic… it makes you appreciate the beauty of real life! I was craving a burger after the movie hahaha! It had a good concept acknowledging the environment and indigenous populations, referring to the after life and the presence of a soul, and categorized scientist into the atheist and spiritual awareness categories! But to make as much money as it did does not reflect on the movies ability to stand on its own merit but purely and merely based on publicity, word of mouth, hype and the over sanitized computer created characters and effects! A lousy ending and now the rumours of a trilogy to justify a typical ending! The concept of entering a world in another body has been done many times before such as the Matrix to name one! The movie began to drag on half way through and lost its theme and appeal! The characters no longer intrigued me and I did not care. I guess I got bored with the Star Wars type clash at the end. However it was still enjoyable but not justifiable, that’s for sure! A fluke, a stroke of luck for Cameron!
I agree with Conor, this was simply put a bad movie. I was shocked at how bad the plot was, even though I had heard before hand not to go see the movie for the plot. How can someone spend so much money on a movie, and not even have an interesting plot ? Typical black and white evil vs good Hollywood crap. No nuances, and so many bad lines I started lauging when it wasn’t even supposed to be funny.
The visuals were ok, but way too much in your face to enjoy. Overall, I would give this movie a 1 star on 10, maybe for the technical effort. Music was as predictable as a McDonalds meal. So much more to rant about, but I’ve got better things to do…
I hope you realize you sound like an asshole saying the music was predictable…
I hope you realize you sound like an asshole for stating an opinion as fact an not backing it up. :>
Classic mashup video of Avatar and Pocahontas. Yeah…real original, Mr. Cameron.
CFV 426 – Avatar/Pocahontas Mashup FINAL VERSION from Randy Szuch on Vimeo.
So the movie was predictable, so what? That doesn’t take away from its greatness at all. You critics have your heads jammed so far up your asses you don’t know which way is down. This movie wasn’t really meant to be a thought-provoking dramatic masterpiece, it was meant to be a fun sci-fi adventure with cool effects. Appreciate it for what its worth; it was entertaining, the effects were unbelievable, and honestly the acting and plot wasn’t that bad; just because it contains cliche’s doesn’t mean its not good. In fact I believe the predictability contributes to its charm because it is so familiar. All in all, this was a solid movie and its really not hard to see why its the highest grossing film of all time, but hey, maybe you would see that if you critics weren’t such pretentious pompous twats.
on that note, I would like to add that Star Wars lost best picture to Annie Hall. Now tell me, who remembers Annie Hall? I rest my case.
[Err popularity =/= creative merit. Maybe if your head wasn't so far up *your* ass you'd know that.]
“If the movie wasn’t so predicabtle, so what?”
Because it’s EASY.
And you know, what if you wrote or created something only to have another person rip it off and make tons of money from it? There is bit of an ethical dilemma when you’re talking about making money via other’s ideas or the effortless use of tired cliches.
And I say tired because I mean tiring. It would stand to reason that after seeing a character, plot or idea so many, many times one would grow understandably bored with it.
The problem here isn’t so much that Avatar entertains or makes money via these cliches and painfully 1D archetypes, it is that saying that it deserves awards for best picture or critical acclaim just because it appeals to the masses who, I’m sorry, aren’t particular difficult to please or evoke, that most critics take issue with.
THAT’s the problem with building a story around and of cliches.
[That, and some critic's bitterness for this movie may, perhaps stem more from idiots like you who bash them for daring to think about a movie beyond its visuals. God forbid god forbid, it's not like the world is suffering a shortage of films and people who just don't want to think about anything and enjoy mindless pleasure. No, those sure are rare.]
bad writing, i mean so the tree was destroyed because of what was underneath yet they never showed more of that, if it was so important then why just leave it.
The Plot … what plot, this was just like all the others talking about some god like structure called the tree, good v. evil, a yoda like character, i mean shit what was original.
It was a movie good enough just to see but nothing made me go WOW
I AGREE. I cant believe that I spent money on that. I thought it was SO boring, it was actually 2 1/2 hours of the SAME THING. Everyone who said it was great obviously doesn’t know what a good movie is. Go watch Taxi Driver or Dances With Wolves (which is basically avatars plot, but actually interesting…) or Gone With the Wind. Learn what makes a good movie. Then watch Avatar again. You will be amazed how much it sucks.
I haven’t even seen the film yet, mainly due to the media hysteria and noting that the Avatar fanbase was almost identical to the Transformers 3 one (sadly), but when I read the plot on Wikipedia (I have to work on that in class) I was like “omg wtf is that, that sound so much like a bunch of cheap cliches, is that fake ? damn all the media and people went to see it, that page must be fake, let’s see other source (like imdb), it must have some hidden message or second-meaning stuff”. Ouch. Truth hurts.
Then came the Pocahontas in Space picture. And the video mashup. I’m doomed.
I’m supposed to talk about the film in my english class, but I think I won’t be able to resist laughing when I’ll have to talk about the plot or the film’s success, it’s like talking seriously about an American Pie, a The Naked Gun or a Hot Shot movie without grinning, that’s just impossible hahah xD damn I need to work on that… let’s try the Jon St. John method :*deadbabiesdeadbabies* … hahah damnit I’m screwed haha xD
I think Avatar was a good movie to watch in a theater especially if its 3d, but otherwise its not as good as another big flick. The colonel is crazy, the storyline is not very clear from the beginning and some things i just cant buy…for eg. if they want to blow up navi people’s habitat ultimately then why they even have to send avatar to study them..
i like the animation…superior
Avatar was not a good movie. I for one need some sort of intellectual ORIGINAL material to help me. And Avatar was far from both of those categories. I am very imagination and am in fact doing an art scholarship solely on surrealism. But Avatar had no imagination it was merely a recycled generic Hollywood script, with a big budget. Really driving nine inch nails into my eyes is more creative and enjoyable than this. Saying we don’t have an imagination because we didn’t decide to “frantically touch our genital organs” over the ALIEN sex scene is just F*cking retarded. Sorry, you can like it, I don’t care that your opinion and this is mine.
Me and one of my friends saw avatar and i thought it wood be alot better than it was i mean common i knew the story in like the first five minits it has hardly eney story and some of the lines are juest stupid and it has a perdictable ending you know whats gonning to happen at the end in like 5 mins (like i sead befor in this comment)WOW the guy falls in love with the girl like i hadent seen that before and me and my friend talked about the whole movie over all i’d give it at 3/10 if your planning to see it i wood say not to waste 7 dollors on that the picture was grate though but like i sead the story sucked so i woodent say “go and se avatar its a grate move” instead i wood probly say “the picture is ok but you’ll end up leaving after 10 mins (i and my friends stayed the whole movie) but i dident like avatar it leads you on with people saing “oh this movie is grate” and if you wont to se a grate acction movie i wood see distruct 9 that was i good movie i saw it twice plus it has a oringal story and grate acction
I could see children liking it, although it could have been 2 hours shorter.
Where did all that money go? I do character design/3d graphics/animation for a livin, not to bust on the people in my circle, but other then paying the actors, I can’t see why this film was as expensive as it turned out to be, unless there was a lot of dicking around aka no real planning and lots of cut scenes.
It’s not groundbreaking or superior in any way whatsoever.
The story was lame, visually it was very average, the acting seemed dull. Character design was lame as hell. …The robot walker’s animation did not make any sense at all, especially during that last fight scene… a robot moving at completely different speeds each scene then using a knife… wtf? lol
I got up to pee twice this movie and when I came back I honestly didn’t care what happened.
btw i hated that part when hes tryen to git that big bird thing and he sead “nobody hunts him so why should he look up” that was by far the WORST line i have ever heard
Your a joke that movie was really good. Gotta love people that go against something just to be different
TRASH.
Rented it (Red Box) this evening and got what I paid for ($1). A total piece of Cameron garbage. Not worth the calories I spent sliding my debit card.
It reminded me of Dreamworks “The Haunting”. How the hell did Spielburg allow that abortion pass through such a newly touted organization? Utter nonsense.
Where are the writers? Can’t somone put a story together anymore? I dig the technology but I’m ashamed that this pile produced the numbers it did at the box office. Total, utter waste of toilet paper. I’ve never taken the time to comment on a movie online or otherwise, but feel a sense of relief to let this one go its own way – Down the Gutter.
I want to give a great review to Clash of the Titans. Worth seeing.
It was okay, the movie is way overrated though.
I disagree. I thoroughly loved it. It created an entire amazing and beautiful world that completely sucked me in. Maybe it is bad to a sci-fi technology geek, but to an average person like me, it was wonderful. I can forgive them for some cheesy one-liners and obvious naming (unobtainium, pandora) because the overall message is important and relevant.
i thought this was incredible in it’s ability to be so utterly crap and still have the masses think it’s good.
i knew exactly what was going to happen from the start, and i even quoted lines before they were said!!
i enjoyed the scenery, but nothing else.
what is good about this story line. man goes into spy on a painfully red indian alien race, the muck hits the fan and he’s found out, he tries to explain the error of his ways as he now likes them and their way of life, they don’t like him he goes off then comes back and they like him again and he saves the day…. might have seen this before… but only ‘once’
I’m only young and have seen strait through this film. where are the days where a film is called good for it’s acting, plot, effects, music etc not just it’s hot chick and big explosions. i’m sorry but it takes more than that to entertain me. special effects is not enough!!
p.s. another thing, did anyone notice how the female pilots makeup was perfect all the way through the film? The people who makes these films know that 90% of the plant are idiots and will accept what they have been told as good, is good. Where as films like ‘no country for old men, or into the wild get over looked as they don’t have huge explosions in them.
Nice to reconfirm:
Utter CRAP. The commercial swell has come and gone. It’s been spun and re-spun. Harsh words have been cast across this ‘little’ blog’. But I haven’t heard, read, or sounded a rebuttal to the Truth be told : “The Nays Have it”. The cash cow is just that. I giant pig of one man’s ego! Avitar is sunk (in every post-market if possible).
Given the oppertunity, The Blog members here at Green Taxi are capable of easily conguring a script worthy of the dollars dumped into this dreary albatross.
THeel
Well, this movie was so horrible that I literally walked out of the theater half way into it. I couldn’t bare the plot, I could care less about the acting, and I don’t watch a movie for its visual graphics, because, just about every dam video game I play makes avatar look like a pile of horse dung. Admittedly I think watching movies in the theater is pointless, I hate the theater experience, and I thought Avatar would be worth watching in the theater, that was a mistake.
The reviewer has directed _____ $1+ Billion movies.
The reviewer has ______ Oscars.
The reviewer has ______ new movie contracts.
The reviewer is qualified and credible because >___ < (sufficient room to fill in blank between arrows.
BTW — The movie was entertaining mind candy with a simple embedded message … and I supppose, some sort of game package for PlayStation.
Poor movie, for the same reason that The Matrix, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter are all bad movies. These movies import a fake, totally imaginative world onto the big screen, and the creators hope that their new manufactured world is perceived by the public as better than the actual world that exists. What’s disturbing is that so many movie watchers fall in love with the movie simply because they are attracted to the bogus world that was portrayed. People tend to like movies where the world seems to be better or cooler or more badass than than the real world we live in. In Avatar, we saw ten-foot blue creature-people play basketball, fly on dinosaur-type animals, defeat an army of human artillery and gunpower, etc. It all seemed really awesome, which is why people liked the movie. I, however, would rather see a movie about the real world that we live in. I don’t want to watch some fake crap straight out of the fantasies of Cameron’s head. That’s why I loved Titanic, but hated Avatar. One movie offered a real storyline with real people and real emotions. The other offered a predictable Hollywood storyline about some creatures that don’t exist on a planet that isn’t real. What about that should interest me, let alone anybody else???!!!
This article is really just about the entertainment value of Avatar, and on the whole I agree with it. But the movie has most definitely made a splash, and I feel like most people I have talked to that enjoyed Avatar were missing a lot when they said that the message was good. I don’t normally care too much about what people think about movies, but in this case, I think that it is important to examine what exactly it is we are taking in an internalizing as a “good message”.
Apart from the fact that the plot of Avatar is totally cliched, I found it pretty offensive. The fictional native culture is put together from bits of other cultures around the world- from American Indian to East Asian, and are highly exoticized and sexualized. The Navi propagate stereotypes that paint all native cultures as peaceful, emotional, and extremely close to nature. While these are generally considered to be admirable qualities, and therefore not offensive, the fact that they are applied as such sweeping generalizations is dehumanizing and patronizing, and it reinforces the stereotypical image of the native that many Westerners have.
Essentially, the plot of this movie follows a white Marine who sets out to learn about the native culture, and eventually comes to realize the merits of the Navi. Along the way, he learns how to hunt, becomes closer to nature, has sex with the hottest member of their race, and proves himself to be an even better Navi than the real Navis. He, the white man, turns into the savior of the race, providing the missing piece that allows them to defeat their oppressors.
While on the surface, Avatar may be a movie championing protection of the environment and speaking out against colonialism, it is really furthering all that is wrong with the way people view native cultures, and putting the white man at the top of the food chain after all.
Wow I’m so glad someone else feels the way I do. I didn’t like the movie either. Hollywood is wasting a lot of money on special effects and leaving out a good plot. I can watch a movie made ten years ago that moves me and enjoy it more than the dizzy spellbinding mode from special effects created today. Some people may like the special effects but I prefer a good plot. I just saw the trailer for inception and I got turned off from all of the special effects. It looks like watching that movie will be like being on a roller coaster ride. If I want that I’ll go to disney world.
every body i talk to seams to love and like you said desiree the millions of dollors thay spend on special effects could of ben spent on plot and makeing the movie at least watchable avatar was WAY WAY over hyped the god farther was a grate movie becouse it had a grate plot it had live actors (avatar is all computer generated)and the god farther is a all round grate movie i wood watchem’ over and over (if i had them on DVD
)
It’s funny that most of the people over 40 that I talk to loved Avatar, whereas people under 30 are split on it. I don’t know if its cynicism of the younger generation, or just a product of not being sci-fi nerds who expect 2001: A Space Odyssey every time they see a movie. I thought it was a great movie, with very poignant messages, a few cliches here and there, but overall…very good. It’s no Godfather, but this blogger is taking it to the extreme. I guess 94% of TOP CRITICS on Rotten Tomatoes, as well as the Golden Globes and Academy of Motion Pictures, Arts and Sciences disagreed with you. Oh, and all the people who went and saw it multiple times because they liked it, pushing the gross to 2.7 billion dollars.
Altough I was a bit disappointed since critics talked it up a little excessively, They continue to believe the film is a decent effort. My sister enjoyed it quite a bit though. To each their own.