Comments on: ICANN Discussion http://www.GreenTaxi.com/icann-discussion/ A journey through Finance, the Environment, and Emerging Industries Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:56:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Conor http://www.GreenTaxi.com/icann-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-7177 Conor Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:49:22 +0000 http://www.GreenTaxi.com/?p=1423#comment-7177 Joe, I know I saw an article saying this somewhere a few months back. This is the only one I can find right now, but I'm fairly sure it all came from the same McAfee study. http://www.securitypronews.com/insiderreports/insider/spn-49-20080605RomaniaHongKongTopListOfDangerousTLDs.html Joe, I know I saw an article saying this somewhere a few months back. This is the only one I can find right now, but I’m fairly sure it all came from the same McAfee study.

http://www.securitypronews.com/insiderreports/insider/spn-49-20080605RomaniaHongKongTopListOfDangerousTLDs.html

]]> By: Joe Davison http://www.GreenTaxi.com/icann-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-7176 Joe Davison Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:31:09 +0000 http://www.GreenTaxi.com/?p=1423#comment-7176 "It has been proven that a majority of phishing fraud (those fake emails claiming they are your bank and ask you to update your account info) come from domains in the Hong Kong (.hk or .co.hk extension)." Where is your source for this contention? I don't think it's accurate. Maybe you mean .cn? “It has been proven that a majority of phishing fraud (those fake emails claiming they are your bank and ask you to update your account info) come from domains in the Hong Kong (.hk or .co.hk extension).”

Where is your source for this contention? I don’t think it’s accurate. Maybe you mean .cn?

]]>