GreenTaxi is Famous
As pointed out by theDomains.com, a cool new feature from DNfame.com allows you to see how you rank in multiple search engines or ranking tools all at once.
I ran it for GreenTaxi and it yielded the following results:
Rank Data
 |
Google Pagerank: 3 | |
 |
Alexa Rank: 1,241,464 | |
 |
Famous Rank: 4/10 * | |
 |
Compete Rank: 899,720 | |
 |
Quantcast Rank: 1,459,594 | |
 |
Technorati Rank: 667,650 | |
|
Technorati Authority: 9 |
Listings Data
 |
DMOZ Listings: 0 | |
 |
Yahoo Directory Listed: No | |
 |
Archive.org Results: 39 |
Search Engine Backlinks
 |
Google Backlinks: 379 | |
|
Yahoo Backlinks: 1,658 | |
 |
AlltheWeb Search Backlinks: 0 | |
 |
AltaVista Search Backlinks: 0 | |
|
Alexa Search Backlinks: 0 | |
 |
Lycos Search Backlinks: 33 | |
 |
Cuil Search Backlinks: 119 |
Social Resources
 |
del.icio.us Bookmarks: 0 | |
 |
Furl Links: 0 | |
 |
Reddit Links: 1 | |
 |
su.bscri.be Links: 0 | |
 |
Faves Bookmarks: 0 | |
 |
Clipmark Clips: 0 | |
 |
Blogmarks Marks: 9748 | |
 |
Propeller Stories: 0 | |
 |
Jumptags Bookmarks: 0 |
Website Thumbnail
Data Graphs
No related posts.
Hey Conor:
Congrats on being listed in DNFAME!
My question is regarding accuracy.
The stats for Compete are different from those on Quantcast.
Which is the more accurate measure?
Thanks,
Claude
Claude,
None of these are accurate, but they build their businesses off of trying to estimate better than the next guy. Even Google Analytics does a poor job with the stats, and they have code embedded on the site. The only true good stats come off the server.
In regards to these stats, I would take an average of everything and then add maybe 20%. I think that is a good rule of thumb. Looking at the charts above, I would say Compete is better than Quantcast, if for nothing more than the fact that Quantcast has zero values for months, which is obviously wrong.
Conor